![]() I think Spotify are going to shake things up a bit, so I guess I’ll wait and see I am just saying that has been my experience and my choice, I don’t have an axe to grind like some people do, if Tidal were to offer something better pricing wise I might consider it again, but I doubt it. As much if this could have been about quality and differences in the original recording as it might have been about the format. The more I read about the technicalities of MQA the more I realised why people argue over it and the less confident I was of what I was getting for the extra £7.Īt times I can certainly hear a difference between the two platforms, but as to which is better I think that to some extent subjective, but I didn’t hear enough of a difference on top of my other thoughts to warrant the extra money. So this is when I started looking more into Qobuz. I tried out some higher than CD quality stuff on both platforms and initially settled on Tidal, personally for me whilst there wasn’t anything wrong with it per say, I got increasingly frustrated about seeing something was MQA but it “only” turning out to be equivalent of CD quality (or arguably less if you consider it’s a lossy codec with whatever magic dust is otherwise sprinkled on it!). Qobuz can also be cheaper if you are willing to pay for it for the whole year in one go, ![]() Qobuz Studio is £12.99 p/m versus the Tidal equivalent with the much debated MQA at £19.99. I think that must be country differences again. I also think it sounds good/great, so now question is, if Qobuz would be so much better to justify almost double the priceĪhhh.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |